<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><app type="annotation" for="doc_AHDM_Intro" view="section" select="George Chapman (1559-1634): 'The best for Comedy'" base-label="">
    <note>
<ln t="tln" n="3"/>
<lem>[1]</lem>
<level n="2">Francis Meres, <i xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">Palladis Tamia</i> (1598), OO3v.</level>
</note>
    <note>
<ln t="tln" n="5"/>
<lem>[2]</lem>
<level n="2">Phyllis Brooks Bartlett, ed., <i xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">The Poems of George Chapman</i> (New York: Modern Language Association of America; London: Oxford University Press, 1941; repr. New York: Russell &amp; Russell, 1962), p. 488; Jean Robertson, ‘The Early Life of George Chapman’, <i xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">Modern Language Review</i> 40 (1945), 157-165 (p. 161).</level>
</note>
    <note>
<ln t="tln" n="6"/>
<lem>[3]</lem>
<level n="2">Despite S. A. Tannenbaum’s claims that the inscription is a forgery, many scholars, including Robertson, Mark Eccles and L. A. Cummings believe it to be genuine. See Tannenbaum, <i xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">Shaksperian Scraps and other Elizabethan Fragments</i> (New York: Columbia University Press, 1933), pp. 142-52. For a contrasting argument see Cummings’s detailed study of Chapman’s handwriting, <i xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">Geo: Chapman his Crowne and Conclusion: A Study of his Handwriting</i> (Salzburg: Universität Salzburg, 1989).</level>
</note>
    <note>
<ln t="tln" n="6"/>
<lem>[4]</lem>
<level n="2">According to John Wolfall the younger, who took up the case on his father’s death (Eccles, p. 183).</level>
</note>
    <note>
<ln t="tln" n="6"/>
<lem>[5]</lem>
<level n="2">Quoted in Mark Eccles, ‘Chapman’s Early Years’, <i xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">Studies in Philology</i>, 43 (1946), 176-93 (p. 182).</level>
</note>
    <note>
<ln t="tln" n="7"/>
<lem>[6]</lem>
<level n="2">Quoted in Eccles, p. 184. This claim is made in response to Chapman‘s petition and was filed circa 27 April 1608 (Eccles, p. 183).</level>
</note>
    <note>
<ln t="tln" n="7"/>
<lem>[7]</lem>
<level n="2">The Wood Street Counter records testify that Chapman was imprisoned there on 9 February 1600 (Eccles, p. 184).</level>
</note>
    <note>
<ln t="tln" n="9"/>
<lem>[8]</lem>
<level n="2">
            <i xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">Hymnus in Cynthiam</i>, ll. 328-47, <i xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">The Poems of George Chapman</i>, ed. by Bartlett.</level>
</note>
    <note>
<ln t="tln" n="9"/>
<lem>[9]</lem>
<level n="2">
            <i xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">George Chapman: Plays and Poems</i>, ed. by Jonathan Hudston, Renaissance Dramatists (London: Penguin, 1998), p. x of the chronology.</level>
</note>
    <note>
<ln t="tln" n="10"/>
<lem>[10]</lem>
<level n="2">Eccles, p. 190. Robertson attributes this discovery to F. S. Boas, p. 165.</level>
</note>
    <note>
<ln t="tln" n="11"/>
<lem>[11]</lem>
<level n="2">Quoted in Robertson, p. 165.</level>
</note>
    <note>
<ln t="tln" n="11"/>
<lem>[12]</lem>
<level n="2">Cummings claims that the debt is written in Shaa’s hand, and signed by Chapman (p. 194), contrary to W. W. Greg’s assertion that it is Chapman’s autograph throughout in <i xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">English Literary Autographs 1550-1650</i>, ed. by W. W. Greg, with J. P. Gilson, Hilary Jenkinson, R. B. McKerrow, A. W. Pollard (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1925-32), Plate XII (a) and (b).</level>
</note>
    <note>
<ln t="tln" n="12"/>
<lem>[13]</lem>
<level n="2">Chapman was also imprisoned with Ben Jonson for anti-Scottish satire in <i xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">Eastward Ho</i> (1605); their collaborator, John Marston, escaped punishment.</level>
</note>
    <note>
<ln t="tln" n="14"/>
<lem>[14]</lem>
<level n="2">C. J. Sisson and Robert Butman, ‘George Chapman, 1612-22: Some New Facts’, <i xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">Modern Language Review</i>, 46 (1951), 185-190 (p. 186).</level>
</note>
    <note>
<ln t="tln" n="14"/>
<lem>[15]</lem>
<level n="2">For a detailed description of this case, see Sisson and Butman.</level>
</note>
    <note>
<ln t="tln" n="15"/>
<lem>[16]</lem>
<level n="2">Sisson and Butman, p. 185.</level>
</note>
    <note>
<ln t="tln" n="16"/>
<lem>[17]</lem>
<level n="2">Sisson and Butman, p. 187.</level>
</note>
    <note>
<ln t="tln" n="16"/>
<lem>[18]</lem>
<level n="2">According to Butman, in Sisson and Butman, p. 187.</level>
</note>
    <note>
<ln t="tln" n="16"/>
<lem>[19]</lem>
<level n="2">Sisson and Butman, p. 185.</level>
</note>
    <note>
<ln t="tln" n="16"/>
<lem>[20]</lem>
<level n="2">Sisson and Butman, p. 190.</level>
</note>
    <note>
<ln t="tln" n="18"/>
<lem>[21]</lem>
<level n="2">Bartlett, p. 478.</level>
</note>
    <note>
<ln t="tln" n="18"/>
<lem>[22]</lem>
<level n="2">David Masson, <i xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">Drummond of Hawthornden: The Story of his Life and Writings</i> (London: Macmillan, 1873), pp. 95-96.</level>
</note>
    <note>
<ln t="tln" n="19"/>
<lem>[23]</lem>
<level n="2">John Davies of Hereford, <i xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">The Scourge of Folly</i> (1611), P8v; Sisson and Butman, p. 190.</level>
</note>
</app>