Internet Shakespeare Editions

Author: Michael Best
Not Peer Reviewed

King Lear: Notes Towards a Textual Introduction


Works Cited

  1. 33Best, Michael. "Variation and Mutabilities: Representing Variants in Shakespeare's Texts." In New Ways of Looking at Old Texts, V. Ed. M. Denbo (forthcoming).
  2. Blayney, Peter W. M. The Texts of King Lear and Their Origins. Vol. 1. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 1979.
  3. Bradley, Lynne. Adapting King Lear for the Stage. Aldershot: Ashgate, 2010.
  4. Braunmuller, A. R. "On Not Looking Back: Sight and Sound and Text." In From Performance to Print in Shakespeare's England. Eds. P. Holland and S. Orgel. Basingstoke and New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2006.
  5. Clare, Robert. "Quarto and Folio: A Case for Conflation." In Lear from Study to Stage: Essays in Criticism. Eds. J. Ogden and A. H. Scouten. Madison: Fairleigh Dickinson UP, 1997.
  6. -----. "'Who is it that can tell me who I am?': The Theory of Authorial Revision between the Quarto and Folio Texts of King Lear." Library Series 6-17.1 (1995): 34-59.
  7. Clayton, Thomas. "'Is This the Promis'd End?': Revision in the Role of the King." In The Division of the Kingdoms: Shakespeare's Two Versions of King Lear. Eds. G. Taylor and M. Warren. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1983.
  8. Clegg, Cyndia, S. "King Lear and Early Seventeenth-Century Print Culture." In King Lear: New Critical Essays. Ed. J. Kahan. New York and London: Routledge, 2008. 104-23.
  9. Craig, Hugh and Arthur Kinney. Shakespeare, Computers, and the Mystery of Authorship. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 2009.
  10. Davidson, Adele. Shakespeare in Shorthand: The Textual Mystery of 'King Lear'. Newark, DE,: U of Delaware Press, 2009.
  11. de Grazia, Margreta and Peter Stallybrass. "The Materiality of the Shakespearean Text." Shakespeare Quarterly 44.3 (1993): 255-83.
  12. Dobson, Michael. "For His Nose Was as Sharpe as a Pen, and a Table of Greene Fields." London Review of Books 29.9 (2007). <http://www.lrb.co.uk/v29/n09/dobs01_.html>.
  13. Doran, Madeleine. The Text of King Lear. London and Stanford: Oxford UP and Stanford UP, 1931.
  14. Duthie, George Ian. Elizabethan Shorthand and the First Quarto of King Lear. Norwood, PA: Norwood Editions, 1977.
  15. Eme, Lukas. Shakespeare's Modern Collaborators. New York and London: Continuum, 2008.
  16. Foucault, Michel. "What Is an Author?" In Textual Strategies: Perspectives in Post-Structuralist Criticism. Ed. J. V. Harari. Ithaca: Cornell UP, 1979. 73-81.
  17. Goldring, Beth. "Cor.'s Rescue of Kent." In The Division of the Kingdoms: Shakespeare's Two Versions of King Lear. Eds. G. Taylor and M. Warren. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1983.
  18. Greg, W. W. The Shakespeare First Folio, Its Bibliographical and Textual History. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1955.
  19. Griffin, Andrew. "Introduction." In The Chronicle History of King Lear. Victoria, BC: Internet Shakespeare Editions, 2011. http://qme.internetshakespeare.uvic.ca/Library/Texts/Leir/intro/GenIntro/default/.
  20. Griffin, Benjamin. Playing the Past: Approaches to English Historical Drama, 1385-1600. Woodbridge, UK, and Rochester, NY: D.S. Brewer, 2001. PR635 H5G75.
  21. Gurr, Andrew. The Shakespeare Company, 1594-1642. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 2004.
  22. Hinman, Charlton. The Printing and Proof-Reading of the First Folio of Shakespeare. 2 vols. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1963.
  23. Holderness, Graham. "Textual Shakespeare." In Shakespeare in the Media: From the Globe Theatre to the World Wide Web. Eds. S. Brusberg-Kiermeier and Jörg. Helbig. Frankfurt am Main and New York: Peter Lang, 2004.
  24. Honigmann, E. A. J. "The New Bibliography and Its Critics." In Textual Performances: The Modern Reproduction of Shakespeare's Drama. Eds. L. Erne and M. J. Kidnie. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge UP, 2004.
  25. Howard-Hill, Trevor. "The Problem of Manuscript Copy for Folio King Lear." The Library Sixth Series 4.1 (1982): 1-24.
  26. -----. "The Two-Text Controversy." In Lear from Study to Stage: Essays in Criticism. Eds. J. Ogden and A. H. Scouten. Madison: Fairleigh Dickinson UP, 1997.
  27. Ioppolo, Grace. Dramatists and Their Manuscripts in the Age of Shakespeare, Jonson, Middleton and Heywood: Authorship, Authority and the Playhouse. London, New York: Routledge, 2006.
  28. -----. Revising Shakespeare. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard UP, 1991.
  29. Kerrigan, John. "Revision, Adaptation, and The Fool in King Lear." In The Division of the Kingdoms: Shakespeare's Two Versions of King Lear. Eds. G. Taylor and M. Warren. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1983.
  30. Kinney, Arthur F. "Transforming King Lear." In Shakespeare, Computers, and the Mystery of Authorship. Eds. H. Craig and A. Kinney. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 2009. 181-201.
  31. Knowles, Richard. "The Evolution of the Texts of Lear." In King Lear: New Critical Essays. Ed. J. Kahan. New York and London: Routledge, 2008. 124-54.
  32. -----. "Two Lears? By Shakespeare?" In Lear from Study to Stage: Essays in Criticism. Eds. J. Ogden and A. H. Scouten. Madison: Fairleigh Dickinson UP, 1997.
  33. Johnson, Gerald D. "Thomas Pavier, Publisher, 1600-1625." The Library, 6th series 14 (1992): 12-48.
  34. Marcus, Leah S. Puzzling Shakespeare: Local Reading and Its Discontents. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1988.
  35. Massai, Sonia. "Nahum Tate's Revision of Shakespeare's 'King Lears.'" Studies in English Literature 40.3 (2000): 435-50.
  36. -----. Shakespeare and the Rise of the Editor. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 2007
  37. -----. "Working with the Texts: Differential Readings." In A Concise Companion to Shakespeare and the Text. Ed. A. Murphy. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing, 2007.
  38. McGann, Jerome J. A Critique of Modern Textual Criticism. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1983.
  39. -----. The Textual Condition. Princeton, NJ: Princeton UP, 1991.
  40. McKenzie, D. F. Bibliography and the Sociology of Texts. London: British Library, 1986.
  41. McMullan, Gordon. Shakespeare and the Idea of Late Writing: Authorship in the Proximity of Death. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 2007.
  42. Quilligan, Maureen. Incest and Agency in Elizabeth's England. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2005. PR428 I57Q55.
  43. Rasmussen, Eric. "The Revision of Scripts." In A New History of Early English Drama. Eds. J. D. Cox and D. S. Kastan. New York: Columbia UP, 1997.
  44. Rutter, Carol. "Eel Pie and Ugly Sisters in King Lear." In Lear from Study to Stage: Essays in Criticism. Eds. J. Ogden and A. H. Scouten. Madison: Fairleigh Dickinson UP, 1997.
  45. Ryan, Kiernan. "King Lear: A Retrospect, 1980-2000." Shakespeare Survey 55 (2002): 1-11.
  46. Shakespeare, William. Hamlet, Prince of Denmark. Ed. P. Edwards. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge UP, 2003.
  47. -----. The Cambridge King Lear CD-ROM: Text and Performance Archive. 2000. CD ROM. Cambridge UP.
  48. -----. The Complete King Lear, 1608-1623. Ed. M. Warren. Berkeley: U of California P, 1989.
  49. -----. The First Quarto of King Lear. Ed. J. L. Halio. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge UP, 1994.
  50. -----. The History of King Lear. Ed. S. Wells. Oxford and New York: Oxford UP, 2000.
  51. -----. King Lear. Ed. R. A. Foakes. London: Thomas Nelson and Sons Ltd, 1997.
  52. -----. King Lear. Eds. B. Mowat and P. Werstine. New York: Washington Square Press, 1993.
  53. -----. King Lear: A Parallel Text Edition. Ed. R. Weis. London and New York: Longman, 1993.
  54. -----. The Tragedy of King Lear. Ed. J. L. Halio. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 1992, 2005.
  55. Slights, Camille. "When Is a Bastard Not a Bastard? Character and Conscience in King John." In Shakespeare and Character: Theory, History, Performance and Theatrical Persons. Eds. P. Yachnin and J. Slights. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2009. 214-31.
  56. Stone, P. W. K. The Textual History of King Lear. London: Scolar Press, 1980.
  57. Taylor, Gary and Michael Warren, eds. The Division of the Kingdoms: Shakespeare's Two Versions of King Lear. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1983.
  58. Taylor, Gary. "King Lear, The Date and Authorship of The Folio Version." In The Division of the Kingdoms: Shakespeare's Two Versions of King Lear. Eds. G. Taylor and M. Warren. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1983..
  59. Urkowitz, Steven. "'The Base Shall to th' Legitimate': The Growth of an Editorial Tradition." In The Division of the Kingdoms: Shakespeare's Two Versions of King Lear. Eds. G. Taylor and M. Warren. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1983.
  60. -----. Shakespeare's Revision of King Lear. Princeton, NJ: Princeton UP, 1980.
  61. Warren, Michael J. "Quarto and Folio King Lear: The Interpretation of Albany and Edgar." In Shakespeare Pattern of Excelling Nature. Eds. D. Bevington and J. L. Halio. Newark DE: Delaware UP, 1978.
  62. Warren, Roger. "The Folio Omission of the Mock Trial: Motives and Consequences." In The Division of the Kingdoms: Shakespeare's Two Versions of King Lear. Eds. G. Taylor and M. Warren. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1983.
  63. Werstine, Paul. "Narratives about Printed Shakespeare Texts: "Foul Papers" and "Bad" Quartos." Shakespeare Quarterly 41 (1990): 65-86.